2023
1.
Joyce, E, Mcillvennan, CK, Esquivel, JH, AJ Sauer,, ...,, Code, J, 29(2) (2023). ., 181–192.
Participating in the peer review process: The Journal of Cardiac Failure construct Journal Article
In: Journal of Cardiac Failure, vol. 29, iss. 2, pp. 181-192, 2023.
Abstract | BibTeX | Altmetric | Tags: heart disease, heart failure, Heart Transplant, peer reivew, research methods | Links:
@article{nokey,
title = {Participating in the peer review process: The Journal of Cardiac Failure construct},
author = {E Joyce and CK Mcillvennan and JH Esquivel and AJ Sauer, and ... and J Code and et al (2023). . , 29(2), 181\textendash192. },
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.11.007},
year = {2023},
date = {2023-02-01},
urldate = {2023-02-01},
journal = {Journal of Cardiac Failure},
volume = {29},
issue = {2},
pages = {181-192},
abstract = {Cardiovascular medicine, and the field of heart failure (HF) in particular, abounds with rapid advances in diagnostics, therapeutics, and implementation, requiring a comprehensive yet efficient pathway to relay these findings to the HF community. To this effect, peer review serves as a cornerstone of academic publishing\textemdashto support meaningful scientific inquiry, rigor, and dissemination. The importance of peer review has been particularly highlighted by the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic as the scientific community has witnessed more online publications including “pre-peer review” drafts and the retraction of high-profile articles owing to inaccurate data.},
keywords = {heart disease, heart failure, Heart Transplant, peer reivew, research methods},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Cardiovascular medicine, and the field of heart failure (HF) in particular, abounds with rapid advances in diagnostics, therapeutics, and implementation, requiring a comprehensive yet efficient pathway to relay these findings to the HF community. To this effect, peer review serves as a cornerstone of academic publishing—to support meaningful scientific inquiry, rigor, and dissemination. The importance of peer review has been particularly highlighted by the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic as the scientific community has witnessed more online publications including “pre-peer review” drafts and the retraction of high-profile articles owing to inaccurate data.
